INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE
Just as Section 230 did not shield Twitter from Hall's discrimination claims, the undeniable evidence in this case confirms that the District Court, through Magistrate Johnstone's illegal pro hac vice policy, granted Twitter 91 undue advantages, clearly demonstrating bias in Twitter's favor. The overwhelming evidence of bias and corruption led both the trial and appellate judges to deliberately conceal these facts in their fabricated judicial opinions. To do so, they falsified the facts of the claims presented, selectively omitted or misrepresented critical legal authorities, and willfully disregarded established rules, laws, and precedents.
DOCUMENTARY DIGITAL EVIDENCE
The direct digital evidence of the Court Records shows that attorneys for Twitter:
1. Represented Twitter in 4 cases, including Halls.
2. Submitted 91 legal arguments to the court on behalf of Twitter.
3. Were not members of the Court's Bar when these submittals were made.
4. Confirms a bias of the Court in favor of Twitter.
CONCEALMENT ACTIONS
Fraud Upon the Court: Both Judge Johnstone and Judge McAuliffe allowed Twitter attorneys to practice without proper admission, violating Local Rule 83.1(a), and N.H. R.S.A 311:7, and engaged in actions that constitute fraud upon the court, as outlined in Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847 (1988).JOHNSTONE, and every judge that has followed, instead, knowingly and willfully- together, and in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, concealed by scheme or device, the material facts of JOHNSTONE’S illegal policy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and corruptly endeavored to influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice in HALL’S case in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, and all while utilizing the court’s machinery.
CIRCUMSTANCIAL
EVIDENCE
-
Patterns of behavior indicating cover-up efforts (e.g., misrepresentation of the facts of the claims, failure to discuss the matter on the record, failure to follow rules, laws and stare decisis).
-
Discrepancies between official statements and reality.
-
Concealment actions.
-
Coordinated narratives to mislead oversight bodies or the public.
-
Leaked admissions of ex parte communications.